[whatwg] several messages
Ian Hickson
ian at hixie.ch
Mon Jun 25 13:32:31 PDT 2007
On Mon, 25 Jun 2007, Kristof Zelechovski wrote:
>
> If there is a character set that sports both, it must be used to put
> down some human language. My point there is no language that could make
> use of this distinction by having both ü and &utrema;. There are
> languages that use ü and theoretically there could be ones that use
> &utrema;, although I do not know of any valid case (I consider the
> French case invalid).
On Mon, 25 Jun 2007, Kristof Zelechovski wrote:
>
> A stressed schwa is present in Polish maritime dialect as well (Kaszëbszczi)
> and Slovaks write "mäso" for "miaso" (meat), but that is not the point. All
> such uses can be covered under the hood of the dieresis; I only want the
> true umlaut to be distinct, not as a code point but as an entity name.
On Mon, 25 Jun 2007, Køi¹tof ®elechovski wrote:
>
> Could I have an example of &otrema; please? Something along the lines
> of zoölogy, but actually required? Not that I doubt your knowledge of
> Dutch but I would like to have it as a demonstration. Chris
This is all academic. HTML is based on Unicode, Unicode doesn't
distinguish these characters. Also, we can't change the entity name, we
would just be adding a redundant character that doesn't work in older UAs.
--
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
More information about the whatwg
mailing list