[whatwg] <base> versus xml:base

[Anne van Kesteren]

On Mon, 05 Mar 2007 22:07:03 +0100, Keryx Web <webmaster at keryx.se> wrote:
> It may be that I've implemented this in the wrong way - corrections are  
> welcome - but it seems to me that even though <xml:base> is legal today,  
> it is **not** supported by UAs. Which makes Anne's proposal, that <base>  
> should be allowed in both serializations, even more important.

There's nu such thing as an xml:base element. It's an attribute. And it is  
supported although there may be some "bugs" with dynamic changes etc.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>