[whatwg] Resurrection of HTML+'s  parsing, how about
replacing it with <pict>, <picture>, <graphic>, or <im>?
Or, how about getting more specific?
<bitmap> [e.g. image/gif of an icon]
<diagram> [e.g. image/svg of a map]
<photo> [e.g. image/jpeg of a cat]
Would that help search engines, I wonder?
More information about the whatwg