[whatwg] Joe Clark's Criticisms of the WHATWG and HTML 5
contact at nickshanks.com
Fri Mar 23 07:08:16 PDT 2007
On 23 Mar 2007, at 13:17, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 13:40:47 +0100, Nicholas Shanks
> <contact at nickshanks.com> wrote:
>> Mostly unused, not even deprecated, these elements bloat the spec,
>> confuse lay authors (i.e. those not of a computer science background)
>> and I feel would be better represented by a custom XML vocabulary.
> How does that help anyone? Putting them in a custom XML vocabulary
> drops all semantics directly. (Unless a search engine does some
> heuristics on element names I suppose.) Custom XML vocabularies are
> really not something you want to have on the web as its implied
> they have no known semantics.
XHTML, MathML and SVG are all custom vocabularies with very widely
There's nothing preventing a future "CodeML" syntax from being
understood by Koders and Google Code Search.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 2157 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the whatwg