[whatwg] P element's content model restrictions

[Jon Barnett]

On 5/29/07, Anne van Kesteren <annevk at opera.com> wrote:
>
> I don't care much for the semantic side of things but changing section 8.2
> (and Acid2) to make <p><table> not become <p></p><table> as per HTML4
> would be fine with me. We discussed this recently in #whatwg. Simon has
> some ideas about it.


Is there a link to any of this discussion?  I imagine my searching for <p>
or "p element" might be futile.

Given:
<p>This is a lengthy paragraph that talks about the following table
<table>...

Breaking scripts that depend on p.nextSibling to be the table and styles
that depend on p + table to work (and other various DOM issues) is an
obvious point, and I'm sure it's been discussed.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20070529/0b2a3a87/attachment-0001.htm>