[whatwg] several messages
Ian Hickson
ian at hixie.ch
Tue Oct 9 16:16:45 PDT 2007
On Mon, 2 Jul 2007, Robert Sayre wrote:
>
> Basically, I think offline caches should respect the Vary: HTTP header,
> and maybe more. Applications will need to do this right anyway, if they
> want to function correctly in the presence of ISP HTTP proxies (AOL,
> TMobile, etc), corporate firewalls, and server-side stuff like Citrix
> Netscalers.
The spec currently requires the "old" cache to be used as an HTTP cache
with HTTP caching semantics obeyed, when updating.
On Mon, 2 Jul 2007, Robert Sayre wrote:
>
> Yes, I should have mentioned that I don't think an Offline API will be
> able to handle Cache-Control:private stuff better than other proxies
> unless it reinvents other HTTP caching mechanisms.
How does this compare to what the spec says today?
On Mon, 2 Jul 2007, Robert Sayre wrote:
>
> Here are some examples:
> http://www.djangobook.com/en/beta/chapter14/#cn125
> http://webmaster.info.aol.com/vary.html
> http://oregonstate.edu/~hopsonro/2006/10/01/internet-explorer-fails-to-explore-internet/
> http://www.somebits.com/weblog/tech/modgzipMSIECache.html
>
> So, there you have it. mod_rewrite, mod_gzip, django, and AOL are
> pretty popular. And IE is kinda broken.
It's not clear to me what I'm supposed to do with these. :-)
--
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
More information about the whatwg
mailing list