[whatwg] Audio(): loop() with 0 or negative value as argument
Dave Singer
singer at apple.com
Fri Oct 19 15:19:13 PDT 2007
At 21:35 +0200 19/10/07, KÞitof Îelechovski wrote:
>This is asymmetric and it does not reflect the common usage:
>intro-canto-canto-canto-coda. You get intro-canto-coda-canto-canto instead.
>I have never encountered such a piece.
>Best regards,
>Chris
I think Ian mis-spoke; loopEnd is where every
loop ends except the *last*. So you get what you
wanted.
I have wondered whether it would be clearer if we
called it loopFrom and loopTo, and had loopCount
be the count of the *extra* plays, and loopNumber
(or loopIndex) the current *extra* play. So if
loopCount is 0, loopStart and loopEnd are
irrelevant, and loopNumber will never exceed 0
either.
(The same names with repeat instead of loop make equal semantic sense).
Would this be easier to explain and document?
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: whatwg-bounces at lists.whatwg.org
>[mailto:whatwg-bounces at lists.whatwg.org] On Behalf Of Michael A. Puls II
>Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 11:25 AM
>To: Ian Hickson
>Cc: whatwg at whatwg.org
>Subject: Re: [whatwg] Audio(): loop() with 0 or negative value as argument
>
>
>loopstart: gives the offset at which playback is to begin for every
>playback iteration except the first. The default value is the same as
>start.
>
>loopend: gives the offset at which playback is to end for every
>playback iteration except the first. The default value is the same as
>end.
--
David Singer
Apple/QuickTime
More information about the whatwg
mailing list