[whatwg] When to stop <video> elements from playing
Křištof Želechovski
giecrilj at stegny.2a.pl
Fri Oct 19 23:26:22 PDT 2007
I have not got the original Mr. Cox's suggestion so I can reply only
indirectly.
1. CSS does not have elements, it defines attributes.
2. "active: none" is language abuse, it should be "playback: none" or
"active: disabled".
Chris
-----Original Message-----
From: whatwg-bounces at lists.whatwg.org
[mailto:whatwg-bounces at lists.whatwg.org] On Behalf Of Jonas Sicking
Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2007 2:38 AM
To: James Cox; whatwg
Subject: Re: [whatwg] When to stop <video> elements from playing
James Cox wrote:
>
> On 20 Oct 2007, at 00:31, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
>
>> After some discussion on IRC, I think Jonas, Hixie and I agreed that
>> we're OK with the following approach:
>> -- sound is produced for display:none elements and elements not in the
>> DOM
>
> what about people hiding ads or other elements via greasemonkey scripts
> (and so on) - using display:none hacks to remove from visibility? If
> naming is an issue, how about a new css element of active:none; which
> prevents any video/sound/display playing.
More information about the whatwg
mailing list