dgerard at gmail.com
Tue Apr 1 15:38:04 PDT 2008
On 01/04/2008, Gervase Markham <gerv at mozilla.org> wrote:
> Robert J Crisler wrote:
> > From my perspective, and for what it's worth, I doubt that
> > the ideals of the W3C as expressed in 220.127.116.11 <http://18.104.22.168> would
> > result in a situation that would be superior to simply letting the
> > international standards body for audio and video codecs deal with these
> > technological areas.
> Your plan would, at least, prevent the "standard" codec being supported
> on Free operating systems. Meeting 22.214.171.124 as it stands would not
> prevent this. Therefore, it would be a superior situation.
The actual solution is a large amount of compelling content in Theora
or similar. Wikimedia is working on this, though we're presently
hampered by a severe lack of money for infrastructure and are unlikely
to have enough in time for FF3/Webkit/HTML5.
More information about the whatwg