[whatwg] WA1: Conformance requirements
ian at hixie.ch
Tue Apr 22 03:38:58 PDT 2008
On Sat, 11 Mar 2006, Aankhen wrote:
> > On 3/11/06, Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch> wrote:
> > [snip]
> > I've reworded the paragraph like this:
> > <p>Some conformance requirements are phrased as requirements on
> > elements, attributes, methods or objects. Such requirements fall
> > into two categories; those describing content model restrictions,
> > and those describing implementatino behaviour.
> Minor change: that should probably be a full colon there rather than a
> > The former category of requirements are requirements on documents and
> > authoring tools. The second category are requirements on user
> > agents.</p>
> Is there a need to say "of requirements" after "category"? It seems
> unnecessary. Perhaps this might do:
> "The former category describes requirements on documents and
> authoring tools. The second describes requirements on user
I recommend not worrying too much about this level of detail of the
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
More information about the whatwg