[whatwg] Scripted querying of <video> capabilities
timeless at gmail.com
Wed Aug 20 05:29:24 PDT 2008
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 1:52 PM, Kristof Zelechovski
<giecrilj at stegny.2a.pl> wrote:
> Only the user that actually encounters a Web site deficiency should report
> it to the creator/owner (assuming they provided a reverse link).
> Otherwise such a report should be ignored as a supposition.
mass complaints work better.
> Why should browser vendors bother that some pages do not display correctly
> in other browsers?
for the good of the web.
> This is a validator's job, and a validator is an authoring tool.
i highly doubt this will work.
> That would mean supporting your competitor, wouldn't it?
can't we all get along and work for a better web?
but yes, it would mean helping your own engine on another profile
which might not support the same features.
More information about the whatwg