[whatwg] RDFa Problem Statement
danbri at danbri.org
Tue Aug 26 14:15:46 PDT 2008
Dan Brickley wrote:
> Ben Adida wrote:
>> Greg Houston wrote:
>>> I am not sure if Ben was eluding to this in the last paragraph, but to
>>> further complicate things SearchMonkey is not actually using RDF,
>> I think you're confusing two different layers.
>> SearchMonkey parses HTML with microformats, and soon HTML+RDFa, and
>> makes that data available in RDF form to PHP scripts that you or anyone
>> else can write.
> It does just this today, from actual RDFa. I've been working on an
> extension that integrates RDFa from the matched pages with additional
> information from external DataRSS (Atom+OpenSearch+RDFa) feeds.
A bit more information from Peter Mika at Yahoo (fwd'd with permission):
the key point... is that indeed DataRSS is both Atom and RDFa
compatible. RDFa is a set of attributes, we merely invented names for
the XML elements that carry them... but you can completely ignore that
and get the triples out by running an RDFa parser over it. OpenSearch is
another extension you can add in the mix if you want.
We turn both microformats and RDFa-in-HTML into DataRSS when used as
input for applications so that SearchMonkey applications can abstract
away from the original format.
formats in the way they were foreseen (Atom extensibility) and complying
with standards (RDFa) without adding to them or changing the meaning of
constructs. So this is a genuine Semantic Web standards play.
Btw, we haven't announced RDFa support officially because we want to get
it 100% right before we do... ok maybe 99% ;)
ps. http://labs.mozilla.com/2008/08/introducing-ubiquity/ is a nice case
for in-page structured data, whether microformatty/posh or rdfa
More information about the whatwg