[whatwg] More random comments on the putImageData definition
Oliver Hunt
oliver at apple.com
Mon Feb 11 00:56:28 PST 2008
On Feb 11, 2008, at 12:33 AM, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
...
>
> I was assuming no-one supported getImageData/putImageData during
> those 5 years. Then there would be no content using it that would be
> broken.
Alas there are already sites depending on it, so we're doomed
On Feb 11, 2008, at 12:37 AM, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
> On Feb 11, 2008 2:57 PM, Oliver Hunt <oliver at apple.com> wrote:
>
....
>
> Not really -- a developer would need to do work to handle browsers
> that did not support the newer hidpi apis. The alternative (a css
> property or whatever) would allow a developer to use a single API,
> but tell the browser that they were aware that there may not be a
> 1:1 ratio between the requested region and the amount of data
> returned -- effectively it would be a flag to say "hey i actually do
> know the spec, and am not blindly expecting this to work on everyone
> else's computer just because it works on mine"
>
> OK, but I wouldn't use a property, I'd use a content attribute,
> because you want to be able to work with <canvas> elements that
> aren't in a document and thus don't really have style.
Ah good point, i had not considered that. I agree, an attribute would
probably be better (although the concept itself is still icky)
> Rob
--Oliver
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20080211/84f2370e/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the whatwg
mailing list