[whatwg] Reverse ordered lists
lists at rikkertkoppes.com
Fri Jan 18 04:15:38 PST 2008
I am not quite sure whether this should be covered by html at all.
List numbering should be a matter of CSS I think. Using an <ol> only
means that it's items are ordered, not in what way. There is a
difference between ordinal value (which might be specified by the value
attribute of an li element) and things like, say, ranking, score and
> Daniel Glazman wrote:
> Usually, the answer is "because nobody uses it anyway...".
> Perhaps so, but I certainly wouldn't say nobody wants to use
> reverse-ordered lists. I've seen plenty of them across the web
> (whether non-HTML or hacked via CSS, tables, etc.), and more than a
> few complaints that there's no easy, standardized way to make them.
> Besides, designing and implementing such a feature ought to be so easy
> for W3C and UA's that the (admittedly minor) benefit would be entirely
> worth the small trouble. I'd never claim my proposal to be
> earth-shattering, but it's not much less worthwhile than the "start"
> attribute. They're both useful in certain
> infrequent-but-not-improbable situations, and stay out of the way when
> not needed. :)
> - Jason (Siemova)
More information about the whatwg