[whatwg] Reverse ordered lists
dwalbert at learnnc.org
Wed Jan 23 16:40:21 PST 2008
On Jan 23, 2008, at 7:10 PM, Robert (Jamie) Munro wrote:
> Surely it should be numbered with the step.
> 6. Foo
> 4. Bar
> 2. Baz
I can see either way being useful in theory, but I haven't seen a use
case for reverse-ordered list where the the step is not -1 -- nor one
with negative-numbered list items. Can anybody cite one or propose one?
More information about the whatwg