[whatwg] Reverse ordered lists

David Walbert dwalbert at learnnc.org
Wed Jan 23 16:40:21 PST 2008

On Jan 23, 2008, at 7:10 PM, Robert (Jamie) Munro wrote:

> Surely it should be numbered with the step.
> ...
> 6. Foo
> 4. Bar
> 2. Baz

I can see either way being useful in theory, but I haven't seen a use  
case for reverse-ordered list where the the step is not -1 -- nor one  
with negative-numbered list items. Can anybody cite one or propose one?

David Walbert
UNC-Chapel Hill

More information about the whatwg mailing list