[whatwg] Is EBCDIC support needed for not breaking the Web?
Henri Sivonen
hsivonen at iki.fi
Mon Jun 2 00:05:23 PDT 2008
On Jun 2, 2008, at 04:27, Benjamin Smedberg wrote:
> Henri Sivonen wrote:
>
>> Firefox and Opera being able get away with not supporting EBCDIC
>> flavors suggests that EBCDIC-based encodings cannot be particularly
>> Web-relevant. Even if saying that browsers MUST NOT support them
>> might end up being a dead letter, it seems that it would be
>> feasible to say that browsers SHOULD NOT support them or at least
>> MUST NOT let a heuristic detector guess EBCDIC (for security
>> reasons).
>
> Gecko does support UTF-7 and will continue to do so because UTF-7 is
> still in use as a character set for mail encoding and multi-part
> MIME documents.
Does/will Gecko support UTF-7 as a possible heuristic detector guess
on the Web/HTTP side?
--
Henri Sivonen
hsivonen at iki.fi
http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
More information about the whatwg
mailing list