[whatwg] several messages

[Paul Waring]

On 23/03/2008, Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch> wrote:
>  > Isn't that the description of a valid positive integer? If that term is
>  > not used or defined yet, why not?
>
>  Because "positive" is confusing to people. Some people (including me)
>  think that 0 is positive.

I'm fairly sure that there are also some people out there who argue
that you can have both -0 and +0, and these are two different numbers.

Paul

-- 
Paul Waring
http://www.pwaring.com