[whatwg] several messages
pwaring at gmail.com
Sun Mar 23 15:43:00 PDT 2008
On 23/03/2008, Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch> wrote:
> > Isn't that the description of a valid positive integer? If that term is
> > not used or defined yet, why not?
> Because "positive" is confusing to people. Some people (including me)
> think that 0 is positive.
I'm fairly sure that there are also some people out there who argue
that you can have both -0 and +0, and these are two different numbers.
More information about the whatwg