[whatwg] Discussion on machine-checkability on public-html
ian at hixie.ch
Thu May 8 16:25:56 PDT 2008
On Fri, 6 Jul 2007, Henri Sivonen wrote:
> As a summary of what might need changing in the spec, I highlight these
> paragraphs (from message 0256 above):
> > A machine-checkable criterion should probably be defined to be a
> > criterion the conformance to which is a decidable problem (in the
> > computer science sense) given a document (Content-Type and finite
> > byte stream) and the knowledge embodied in the spec and the normative
> > references.
> > That is, the program computing whether a given document conforms to a
> > criterion should not be required to consult outside resources and
> > should not embody arbitrary knowledge that isn't part of the spec
> > (with normative references).
I don't understand how the spec doesn't already say all this in the phrase
> However, I also wrote:
> > As a side note: For extra usefulness, a checker can have knowledge
> > about particular URI scheme-specific requirements. Different choices
> > here cause a theoretical problem. If we want to remove the
> > theoretical problem, the spec could enumerate a closed list of URI
> > schemes that conformance checkers must know about. (Forbidding the
> > application of knowledge about common schemes like http, https and
> > mailto would be silly.)
I don't really see what the problem is here.
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
More information about the whatwg