[whatwg] Absent rev?
Dan Brickley
danbri at danbri.org
Tue Nov 18 07:03:01 PST 2008
Dan Brickley wrote:
> Without rev, content creators (in every language) will need to go
> through this dance, hunting through dictionaries and debating
> subtleties, to make sure that they've identified a suitable pair of
> words such that { X word1 Y } is true if and only if { Y word1 X }.
> Which is why I see this in terms of division of labour. Cleaning it out
> of HTML5 makes work elsewhere...
Sorry that should've been,
{ X word1 Y } is true if and only if { Y word2 X }.
Dan
ps. (since i'm mailing again, sorry) ... in an RDF/XML context, we had
this issue in FOAF: we added 'depicts' alongside 'depiction' because the
old RDF/XML syntax didn't deal well with inverses
More information about the whatwg
mailing list