[whatwg] MetaExtensions wiki page

[Ian Hickson]

On Thu, 27 Nov 2008, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 18:46:51 +0100, Philipp Serafin <phil127 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I guess this is more a cosmetic remark, but I thought I'd bring this up
> > anyway.
> > I've noticed that the paragraph on the MetaExtensions wiki page[1] still
> > lists the Microformats process as the only way to get a keyword approved.
> > The equivalent paragraph on the RelExtensions page[2] had been changed to
> > "... or must be defined by a W3C specification in the Candidate
> > Recommendation or Recommendation state." some time ago.
> > Shouldn't both paragraphs be identical, or are @rel and <meta> values really
> > handled differently?
> 
> They should be identical, feel free to fix the page ;-)

Actually in this instance it's the spec that will be fixed in due course.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'