[whatwg] Add 'type' attribute to <mark>
ian at hixie.ch
Fri Oct 31 12:29:00 PDT 2008
On Fri, 31 Oct 2008, Pentasis wrote:
> Anyway, following some discussions on the web regarding footnotes/side
> notes I have found that there is a need for some form of element to mark
> these up. The most commonly accepted element at the moment seems to be
> to use the <small> element. But this is clearly a wrong use of
The spec already describes how to do footnotes:
> As the <mark> element has different usages defined on it already why not
> include a "type" attribute (or similar) that defines what it is used
> for. One of these types would then be "footnote", others could be
> (relating to what is already in the spec) "term", "highlight" etc. (I am
> sure others would be much better at thinking up names than I am).
That's what the "class" attribute is for.
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
More information about the whatwg