ben at adida.net
Tue Sep 9 09:42:30 PDT 2008
Ian Hickson wrote:
> Both introducing a namespace prefix processing model and introducing DOM
> inconsistencies at the XML/HTML boundary intentionally are simply not an
> option in WHATWG specs at this point.
What is the evidence you have for making this decision, specifically
what is the evidence you have for conflating past issues with this one?
Who gets to make this decision? What is the process by which such a
decision is made?
(Note that the XML/HTML DOM consistency issue is not real, so it's worth
focusing on the prefix issue.)
More information about the whatwg