[whatwg] Safari-compatible <input type="search">
Andy Lyttle
whatwg at phroggy.com
Tue Sep 30 11:52:45 PDT 2008
On Sep 30, 2008, at 10:23 AM, Kristof Zelechovski wrote:
> I am not against INPUT[type=search]; I am against INPUT[results=10]
> because
> I cannot see how it can be reasonably preset.
Yeah, that's weird. I think if I designed it myself, I would have
made the presence of autosave (instead of results) trigger the
magnifying glass icon, used a sensible default for the number of
items in the search history (maybe 10 or 20), used something like
historylength to override it, and make setting historylength=0
disable the menu (leaving the icon). Something like that. But
that's not how Apple did it, and we should be compatible with them.
> Is this control for simple search only or is it designed to be used
> in an
> advanced search interface? Should it be unique within a form?
Excellent question! I imagine it should be unique within a form.
Whether it's appropriate for an advanced search interface would
depend on the interface; if there's one input that's an obvious
choice for type="search" then go ahead and use it, otherwise it might
be better to stick with type="text".
Hopefully someone more qualified than I can provide a better answer.
--
Andy Lyttle
whatwg at phroggy.com
More information about the whatwg
mailing list