[whatwg] native ordered dictionary data type in web storage draft
pmuellr at muellerware.org
Tue Apr 14 10:54:15 PDT 2009
James Graham wrote:
> Aryeh Gregor wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Patrick Mueller
>> <pmuellr at muellerware.org> wrote:
>>> This is the first time I've seen the requirement for such a beast.
>>> You can
>>> understand the desire for it, given the context, but still. Does
>> essentially, an ordered dictionary?
> Yes. Indeed there are compatibility requirements for the ordering of
> ordinary user-created Object Objects in web browser implementations; the
> order of enumeration must be the same as the order of insertion of the
links in jresig's blog post
in the "for loop order" section.
Still doesn't seem like it makes sense to go ahead and build
dependencies on this (unfortunate, IMO) behavior.
More information about the whatwg