[whatwg] Storage mutex

[Robert O'Callahan]

On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Jeremy Orlow <jorlow at chromium.org> wrote:

> To me, getStorageUpdates seems to imply that updates have already happened
> and we're working with an old version of the data.  I think many developers
> will be quite shocked that getStorageUpdates _enables_ others to update
> storage.  In other words, 'get' seems to imply that you're consuming state
> that's happening anyway, not affecting behavior.
>

fetchStorageUpdates?

Rob
-- 
"He was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our iniquities;
the punishment that brought us peace was upon him, and by his wounds we are
healed. We all, like sheep, have gone astray, each of us has turned to his
own way; and the LORD has laid on him the iniquity of us all." [Isaiah
53:5-6]
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20090825/6ae6dd93/attachment.htm>