[whatwg] small element should allow nested elements
brucel at opera.com
Sun Aug 9 06:26:03 PDT 2009
On Fri, 07 Aug 2009 14:19:23 +0100, Remy Sharp <remy at leftlogic.com> wrote:
> I know Bruce Lawson has mentioned that this has been brought up before,
> but I couldn't find it in the archives (searching "small"), so I'd like
> to bring it up again.
I suggested it in the w3c list, not this one. Link:
> When I wrap *everything* in the small element (as seen here:
> http://jsbin.com/okevo ) all the browsers I've tested it in renders the
> text as I would expect, but it doesn't validate against the HTML 5
> parsing rules (as you'd expect).
> Here's the list of the compatible browsers (I could have done more
> browsers, but I think this test with 10 proves the support is solid):
Previously we got on a bit of a navelgaze about what constitutes legalese/
disclaimers and whether any sites actually use it. But given that browsers
currently allow <small> to go round block level elements, I agree with
Remy that we should document the current state of browsers and allow the
element to be both "inline" and "block", like <a>, <ins> and <del>.
More information about the whatwg