[whatwg] "complete" DOM attribute (image elements)
bzbarsky at MIT.EDU
Sun Aug 30 17:35:03 PDT 2009
Ian Hickson wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Sep 2007, Gavin Sharp wrote:
>> It appears this behavior was explicitly chosen in Mozilla, in bug 190561
>> (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=190561). I think the
>> arguments given in that bug might merit reconsideration; detection of
>> image existence is currently possible by other means
>> and I'm not sure
>> how much weight "the Rhino Book" should have in influencing current DOM
None whatsoever, in my opinion.
> My findings match yours. I have left the spec as is, for compatibility
> with IE, and because it seems the most logical.
It seems like a privacy leak to me, in the case of cross-site images.
More information about the whatwg