[whatwg] Interface objects in Web Workers
ian at hixie.ch
Tue Dec 1 21:17:13 PST 2009
On Wed, 25 Nov 2009, Simon Pieters wrote:
> The "Interface objects and constructors" section says
> "There must be no interface objects and constructors available in the
> global scope of scripts whose script's global object is a
> WorkerGlobalScope object except for the following:"
> WorkerGlobalScope, WorkerLocation, Navigator, AbstractWorker, ErrorEvent
> are not in the list. Is this intentional? If they're intended to not
> create interface objects, it would be clearer if the IDLs had
I've changed that section to be more precise legalese that automatically
does the right thing.
> Should EventTarget and Event be in the list?
These are now automatically covered by the new magical text in the
aforementioned section. (Basically I said that any interfaces relevant to
exposed APIs are automatically to be available.)
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
More information about the whatwg