[whatwg] [hybi] How to select which websocket protocol to use
Francis Brosnan Blazquez
francis at aspl.es
Thu Dec 24 02:37:15 PST 2009
> I'm not a big fan for exposing more detail in the API, because
> that just exposes transport details to the application.
connection (or close to)...however it seems there is no consensus on
WebSocket protocol design.
BWTP has the advantage that works over existing HTTP infrastructure
(specially HTTP proxy) and its framing design is more secure (length
limited) and consistent (only one) but it provides lot of features that
makes it too heavy for the purpose (implement something similar to
..and WebSocket has the advantage that fits better the purpose but has a
problem with existing infrastructure and a framing style which could
provide binary support but at the end, how is this signaled from
Ian, I think when IANA proposed WebSocket to use 80 and 443 port, maybe
they were also saying to accomodate the WebSocket protocol to be
friendly with existing HTTP infrastructure. What do you think?
In the other hand, there is a general consensus that an octet and length
limited framing is more robust, secure and general (you can transmit
both UTF-8 or arbitrary binary content). Why don't change this to have a
single framing style?
Francis Brosnan Blazquez <francis at aspl.es>
More information about the whatwg