[whatwg] typo in UTF-16LE BOM sniffing rule
Dan Winship
dan.winship at gmail.com
Sun Feb 22 06:15:42 PST 2009
In the summary table at the end of "2.7.4 Content-Type sniffing: unknown
type", the UTF-16LE BOM is incorrectly listed as "FF FF" instead of "FF
FE". (The UTF-16BE BOM is correct, and the UTF-16LE one is stated
correctly earlier in the text):
FF FF 00 00 FE FF 00 00 text/plain n/a UTF-16BE BOM
FF FF 00 00 FF FF 00 00 text/plain n/a UTF-16LE BOM
^^
FF FF FF 00 EF BB BF 00 text/plain n/a UTF-8 BOM
-- Dan
More information about the whatwg
mailing list