[whatwg] Minor error in content‐type sniffing table

[Geoffrey Sneddon]

On 2 Jan 2009, at 22:39, 111mth at gmail.com wrote:

> In section 2.7.4 of the specification, part of the table reads
> FF FF 00 00
> FE FF 00 00
> text/plain
> n/a
> UTF-16BE BOM
> FF FF 00 00
> FF FF 00 00
> text/plain
> n/a
> UTF-16LE BOM
> in the 1 January draft.
>
> Should this be
> FF FF 00 00
> FE FF 00 00
> text/plain
> n/a
> UTF-16BE BOM
> FF FF 00 00
> FF FE 00 00
> text/plain
> n/a
> UTF-16LE BOM
> ?

Yes.


--
Geoffrey Sneddon