[whatwg] Trying to work out the problems solved by RDFa

[Henri Sivonen]

On Jan 11, 2009, at 18:52, Calogero Alex Baldacchino wrote:

> However, actually it's the same for RDFa attributes, because they're  
> not in the spec. From this point of view, introducing six new  
> attributes, or resorting to an older one is not very different, thus  
> (again) why RDFa and not eRDF?


eRDF is very different in not relying on attributes whose qname  
contains the substring "xmlns".

-- 
Henri Sivonen
hsivonen at iki.fi
http://hsivonen.iki.fi/