[whatwg] Trying to work out the problems solved by RDFa

Henri Sivonen hsivonen at iki.fi
Mon Jan 12 11:31:13 PST 2009

On Jan 11, 2009, at 18:52, Calogero Alex Baldacchino wrote:

> However, actually it's the same for RDFa attributes, because they're  
> not in the spec. From this point of view, introducing six new  
> attributes, or resorting to an older one is not very different, thus  
> (again) why RDFa and not eRDF?

eRDF is very different in not relying on attributes whose qname  
contains the substring "xmlns".

Henri Sivonen
hsivonen at iki.fi

More information about the whatwg mailing list