[whatwg] Fuzzbot (Firefox RDFa semantics processor)

[James Graham]

Giovanni Gentili wrote:
> James Graham:
>> The issue when trying to abstract problems is that you can end up doing
>> "architecture astronautics"; you concentrate on making generic ways to build
>> solutions to weakly constrained problems without any attention to the
>> details of those problems that make them unique.
> 
> I think the right level, like in my proposal,
> is greatly under "astronautics"
> but no so low as "single vocabularies".
> 

I rather disagree. How we interact with information depends 
fundamentally on the type of information. If the information is a set of 
geographical coordinates, for example, the set of useful interactions 
are rather different to those for a bibliographic entry. Trying to 
pretend that the two problems are just interchangeable instances of the 
same "semantically structured information" problem is likely to hide the 
important distinctions between the two problem domains.