[whatwg] Codecs for <audio> and <video> -- informative note?
Simetrical+w3c at gmail.com
Mon Jul 6 11:18:56 PDT 2009
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 4:01 AM, David Gerard<dgerard at gmail.com> wrote:
> A spec that makes an encumbered format a "SHOULD" is unlikely to be
> workable for those content providers, e.g. Wikimedia, who don't have
> the money, and won't under principle, to put up stuff in a format
> rendered radioactive by known enforced patents.
That's why "should" is not the same as "must". Those who have a good
reason not to do it can decline to do it.
More information about the whatwg