[whatwg] Codecs for <video> and <audio>

Mike Shaver mike.shaver at gmail.com
Tue Jul 14 11:42:14 PDT 2009

On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Peter Kasting<pkasting at google.com> wrote:
> It makes sense if you think about it -- whether YouTube sends videos encoded
> as H.264 is irrelevant to what the _baseline_ codec for <video> needs to be,
> it is only relevant as additional info for vendors deciding whether to
> support H.264.

Yes, I concur --  I couldn't think of any reason for that to be
relevant to the discussion of baseline codecs at first, so I tried to
make it fit (and asked questions about the details of it).

I will patiently await the details. :-)


More information about the whatwg mailing list