[whatwg] Issues with Web Sockets API
jorlow at chromium.org
Tue Jul 28 16:59:29 PDT 2009
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch> wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Jul 2009, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
> > If it's only for debugging purposes, maybe a cleaner way to define it is
> > to simply be the last event fired on a given WebSocket?
> I don't really understand what problem we would be trying to solve by
> changing that.
I was just suggesting that perhaps the model could be simplified and that
this might make it less confusing to web and UA developers. I haven't
studied this issue in detail though, so if you think it's a silly idea,
there's a good chance it is.
As for the rest of your changes, I think they should work well.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the whatwg