[whatwg] A few comments on the <keygen> tag
ian at hixie.ch
Fri Jun 12 18:11:28 PDT 2009
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 3:52 PM, Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch> wrote:
> > I agree, <keygen> seems like a poor design. That's one of the reasons
> > I didn't extend it in HTML5; we're just defining what it does in
> > browsers so that new browsers can implement it if they want to be
> > compatible with the existing browsers.
> We could possibly make it non-conforming though. I don't have a strong
> opinion either way, on one hand I think we want to discourage its use
> since it's a pretty crappy feature, on the other hand, I'm not sure that
> the people that are using it have a choice, so making it non-conforming
> without providing any alternatives isn't going make anyone stop using
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
> I share your distaste for <keygen>. But I also agree that it's unhelpful
> to make it nonconforming without providing an alternative. Maybe in
> HTML6, if we develop a better solution in the meantime.
I've left it conforming for now. I don't think it'd make much difference
in this case anyway (I don't see people rushing to use it, and the lack of
spec support so far certainly hasn't stopped people).
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
More information about the whatwg