[whatwg] localStorage + worker processes
jonas at sicking.cc
Mon Mar 23 14:23:44 PDT 2009
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 11:41 AM, Jeremy Orlow <jorlow at google.com> wrote:
> One thing that hasn't been considered yet is some sort of optional hint to
> say "I'm done" in terms of accessing localStorage. Maybe call it
> localStorage.checkpoint() or localStroage.commit()?
> As far as the browser implemenation is concerned, a call to this function
> would be the same as the script ending. The great thing about this is that
> if a developer found one problem location in their code, they could add
> it--but it'd be completely optional.
> This could be used in conjunction with most of the other ideas already
> floating around.
This is definitely an interesting idea. It does become less critical
if we go with the async lock approach, but even then it's worth
More information about the whatwg