[whatwg] Removing the need for separate feeds
danbri at danbri.org
Fri May 22 00:42:16 PDT 2009
On 22/5/09 09:21, Ian Hickson wrote:
> On Fri, 22 May 2009, Henri Sivonen wrote:
>> On May 22, 2009, at 09:01, Ian Hickson wrote:
>>> USE CASE: Remove the need for feeds to restate the content of HTML pages
>>> (i.e. replace Atom with HTML).
>> Did you do some kind of "Is this Good for the Web?" analysis on this
>> one? That is, do things get better if there's yet another feed format?
> As far as I can tell, things get better if the feed format and the default
> output format are the same, yes. Generally, redundant information has
> tended to lead to problems.
Would this include having a mechanism (microdata? xml islands?) that
preserves extension markup from Atom feeds? eg. see
More information about the whatwg