[whatwg] What is the purpose of timeupdate?
Simon Pieters
simonp at opera.com
Fri Nov 6 14:52:42 PST 2009
On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 18:11:18 +0100, Brian Campbell
<brian.p.campbell at dartmouth.edu> wrote:
>> Brian, since Firefox is doing what you proposed -- can you think of any
>> other issues with its current implementation? What about for audio
>> files?
>
> The way Firefox works is fine for me. I haven't yet tested it with audio
> only, but something around 25 or 30 updates per second would work fine
> for all use cases that I have; 15 updates per second is about the
> minimum I'd consider useful for synchronizing one off events like
> bullets or slide transitions (this is for stuff where you want good,
> tight sync for stuff with high production values), and while animations
> would work at that rate, they'd be pretty jerky.
What if you have a video with say one frame per second? Unless I'm
mistaken Firefox will still fire timeupdate once per frame. (The spec says
you have to fire at least every 250ms.)
--
Simon Pieters
Opera Software
More information about the whatwg
mailing list