[whatwg] Microdata DOM API issues

Philip Jägenstedt philipj at opera.com
Fri Nov 13 15:14:37 PST 2009


On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 19:27:39 +0100, Philip Jägenstedt <philipj at opera.com>  
wrote:

> On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 03:23:54 +0100, Philip Jägenstedt  
> <philipj at opera.com> wrote:
>
>> Why are the algorithms for extracting RDF gone? All that's left is the  
>> book example with the equivalent Turtle, but it would be nice if it  
>> were actually defined how to extract RDF. The same for the JSON stuff,  
>> was that no good?
>
> D'oh! I've been reading the multipage version and missed that it's on  
> another page:
>
> http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/converting-html-to-other-formats.html
>
> I'll have to try implementing that and see if there are any more issues.
>

http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/converting-html-to-other-formats.html#json

This was easy to implement, but the algorithm isn't guaranteed to  
terminate.

<div itemscope>
   <div itemprop="foo" itemscope itemref="oops" id="oops"></div>
</div>

This simple input causes the algorithm to recurse as the item references  
itself. I went back to the vCard algorithm and found that it too will fail  
to terminate with this input:

<span itemscope itemtype="http://microformats.org/profile/hcard">
   <span itemprop="agent" itemscope id="oops" itemref="oops"
         itemtype="http://microformats.org/profile/hcard">
</span>

vEvent is safe as the algorithm never recurses, but the RDF conversion  
algorithm would hit the same problem.

It's certainly possible to create loops which are less easy to spot:

<div itemscope>
   <div itemprop="prop1" itemscope itemref="id2" id="id1"></div>
   <div itemprop="prop2" itemscope itemref="id3" id="id2"></div>
   ...
   <div itemprop="propn" itemscope itemref="id1" id="idn"></div>
</div>

Or this:

<div itemscope>
   <div itemprop="foo" itemscope id="a">
     <div itemprop="bar" itemscope itemref="a"></div>
   </div>
</div>

The itemref mechanism allows creating arbitrary graphs of items, rather  
than the tree of items that is the intended microdata model (right?). Even  
though my default reaction to graphs is "oh cool", for microdata when the  
domain model is a graph you should probably just represent it with a level  
of indirection (RDF).

Options:
1. patch the algorithms which can go into recursion
2. patch  
<http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/microdata.html#associating-names-with-items>  
to first check if an itemref'd property creates a loop before adding it to  
candidates
3. ?

I think I prefer 2.

-- 
Philip Jägenstedt



More information about the whatwg mailing list