[whatwg] localStorage mutex - a solution?

Robert O'Callahan robert at ocallahan.org
Tue Nov 24 17:24:46 PST 2009

On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Jonas Sicking <jonas at sicking.cc> wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Rob Ennals <rob.ennals at gmail.com> wrote:
> > In spec language, I think it should be "MAY" release.
> It seems to me that the only difference between what we have now (in
> the spec), and your suggestion, would be that implementations could in
> more cases claim to follow the spec. I.e. the only difference seems to
> be one of PR for implementations. Nothing that would actually help web
> authors.

I think IE and Chrome would have to change their implementations.

"He was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our iniquities;
the punishment that brought us peace was upon him, and by his wounds we are
healed. We all, like sheep, have gone astray, each of us has turned to his
own way; and the LORD has laid on him the iniquity of us all." [Isaiah
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20091125/49cdadc4/attachment-0002.htm>

More information about the whatwg mailing list