[whatwg] Storage events
Maciej Stachowiak
mjs at apple.com
Thu Oct 15 12:44:03 PDT 2009
On Oct 15, 2009, at 11:37 AM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
> I'd like to propose we remove the "source" attribute from storage
> events. (http://dev.w3.org/html5/webstorage/#the-storage-event)
>
> In Chrome, we cannot provide access to a window object unless it's
> in the same process. Since there's no way to guarantee that two
> windows in the same origin are in the same process, Chrome would
> need to always set it to null in order to avoid confusing developers
> (since what process a page is in is really an implementation detail).
I would guess the main use case for this is to distinguish changes
from *this* window (the one receiving the event) and changes from
other windows. Perhaps a boolean flag to that effect could replace
source.
- Maciej
>
> But, as far as I can tell, Safari is the only browser that currently
> provides this. I suspect that as other multi-process
> implementations are developed, they'll run into the same issue.
> And, even if they can technically provide synchronous access to
> another processes Window object, there are _very_ strong arguments
> against it. So, can we please remove the source attribute from
> storage events?
>
>
> One other question: is the URL attribute supposed to be the same as
> documentURI or location.href? I ask because WebKit currently uses
> the documentURI but if this were the correct behavior, I would have
> expected the spec to make that more clear.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20091015/bbe94ce6/attachment.htm>
More information about the whatwg
mailing list