derernst at gmx.ch
Fri Oct 9 14:51:27 PDT 2009
Peter Brawley schrieb:
> >Everything that can be achieved with <frameset> can be done through
> If that's so, someone ought to be able to point at some examples.
I think that the discussion if or not there may be a use case where
framesets are "good" is not the point.
> Supposing that someone can produce examples, the argument for removing
> frames from HTML5 becomes: "frameset has been in HTML till now, /but is
> being removed because we do not like it/. If you insist on such use
> cases, re-architect them." That's a misuse of standards.
This is rather the point. There might be a use case where dictatorship
is good - only a dictator might i.e. make laws to really protect the
environment, which would not be possible in a democracy. There might
even be a use case where chemical weapons are good - they might i.e.
serve to fight a rat plague somewhere in a third-world country. Still we
(well, I hope most of us) *do not like* dictatorship and chemical
weapons. This is reason enough to try to contribute to a world where
they are not wide-spread.
So, if the people who discuss and define the HTML5 standard *do not
like* framesets, it is IMO reason enough for them to take them out of
this standard. This will, as stated already by several posters, not
prevent you from using a frameset to do something "good" with it, and
you will be as safe as you are now, as UAs will support legacy content
for the years to come.
More information about the whatwg