[whatwg] framesets
Simon Pieters
simonp at opera.com
Mon Oct 12 00:37:36 PDT 2009
On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 23:43:03 +0200, Eduard Pascual <herenvardo at gmail.com>
wrote:
> For it to be taken
> seriously by the editor, I strongly recommend that you send spec-ready
> quality text,
I recommend sticking to use cases, requirements, links to real-world
pages, and proposed solutions with pros/cons.
> <frameset> is not being removed from HTML.
It's being removed from the set of conforming elements in HTML, along with
e.g. <applet>. It's not being removed from what browsers have to
implement: HTML5 specs frameset for browsers in the parsing, rendering and
obsolete features sections.
> It's just not being updated
> because there was nothing to add to it, so it stays the same.
Not really:
Elements in the following list are entirely obsolete, and must not be
used by authors:
frame
frameset
noframes
Either use iframe and CSS instead, or use server-side includes to
generate complete pages with the various invariant parts merged in.
http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/obsolete.html#non-conforming-features
> Taking all this together, here comes again: the question I have
> already asked several times, and you haven't answered: What are you
> asking for?
I would presume that Peter is asking for frameset, frame and noframes to
be part of the set of conforming elements in HTML. Correct, Peter?
--
Simon Pieters
Opera Software
More information about the whatwg
mailing list