derernst at gmx.ch
Mon Oct 12 08:09:19 PDT 2009
tali garsiel schrieb:
> <Pine.LNX.4.62.0910121145480.25383 at hixie.dreamhostps.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1255"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> I guess it's not a HTML5 question but more a "best practice" question but ...
> In case an application has navigation menus that cannot be reloaded each time.Only the content part should be reloaded.
> What is a better
> 1. Using an iframe for the content and fixing bookmarking/back button
> 2. Using Ajax to update the content - a "single document application"
> The issue with the later option is not user experience but browser performance.
> Is never reloading the document, only updating the DOM harmful? (like caches wont be cleaned , garbage collection will not be done properly) .
> Maybe it's browser specific but it also has to do with what browsers are supposed to support and test.
I assume that if you do care about search engines, the Ajax approach
will require some amount of extra coding in order to make the content
Anyway, with extra coding you can also match most of Peter's
requirements regarding user experience with a single-page solution. I am
sure you can pass the state of the navigation tree via query string, and
accordingly collapse or expand the nodes when a page is loaded. You can
also pass the current scroll position of the page.
What may be missing is the possibility to pass the scroll position of
the navigation or content, if they are in divs with overflow:scroll. I
am not familiar enough with DOM - if they do not yet exist, it might be
worth to consider enabling pageYOffset, pageXOffset, scrollBy() and
scrollTo() for all element objects that can contain scrollable content
rather than for the window object only.
More information about the whatwg