[whatwg] Please always use utf-8 for Web Workers
Drew Wilson
atwilson at google.com
Mon Sep 28 09:59:15 PDT 2009
Ah, sorry for the confusion - my use of "default" was indeed sloppy. I'm
saying that if the server is explicitly specifying the charset either via a
header or via BOMs, it seems bad to ignore it since there's no other way to
override the charset.
I understand your point, though - since workers don't inherit the document
encoding from their parent, they may indeed decode a given resource
differently if the server isn't specifying a charset in some way.
-atw
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 4:47 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk at opera.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 19:34:18 +0200, Drew Wilson <atwilson at google.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Again, apologies if I'm misunderstanding the suggestion.
>>
>
> I thought that by "default encoding" you meant the encoding that would be
> used if other means of getting the encoding failed. If there is only one
> encoding it is not exactly the "default", since it cannot be changed.
>
>
>
> --
> Anne van Kesteren
> http://annevankesteren.nl/
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20090928/af54b010/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the whatwg
mailing list