[whatwg] RFC: Alternatives to storage mutex for cookies and localStorage
Chris Jones
cjones at mozilla.com
Fri Sep 4 15:22:09 PDT 2009
Robert O'Callahan wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 9:44 PM, Jeremy Orlow <jorlow at chromium.org
> <mailto:jorlow at chromium.org>> wrote:
>
> I think it's pretty clear that the spec, as is, is not possible to
> implement without making it trivial for a single website to lock up
> all of your event loops....
>
>
> I don't think that's clear at all, yet.
>
> It's clearly *hard* to implement, and Chris' proposal for transactional
> localStorage is a lot easier to implement, so if we can get away with
> the compatibility break, we should.
>
I don't think it's hard to implement, even implementing it without
literally using a global mutex. I just don't think it solves the
problem of guaranteeing cross-tab data integrity for poorly written
sites. And if the intention is to make scripts appear to run
atomically, then I think there are better ways to specify that than
storage mutex.
My problem with storage mutex boils down to the fact that by the letter
of the spec, a script can lock out the UA indefinitely by just reading a
cookie. Obviously we're going to have to break that in some situations.
So if that's the case, why present that abstraction to scripts?
Transactional semantics seems to be a better abstraction, and an
ancillary benefit is that it's much easier to implement to boot. Though
even if it were harder to implement, I would still argue for it.
Cheers,
Chris
> This is especially true if the storage mutex extends to cookies
> since one tab running a poorly written site can lock everything up.
>
>
> Only if you actually implement the semantics using a single global lock.
> I think we could do better.
>
> Rob
> --
> "He was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our
> iniquities; the punishment that brought us peace was upon him, and by
> his wounds we are healed. We all, like sheep, have gone astray, each of
> us has turned to his own way; and the LORD has laid on him the iniquity
> of us all." [Isaiah 53:5-6]
More information about the whatwg
mailing list