[whatwg] RFC: Alternatives to storage mutex for cookies and localStorage

Chris Jones cjones at mozilla.com
Tue Sep 8 16:31:40 PDT 2009

Chris Jones wrote:
> Jonas Sicking wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Chris Jones<cjones at mozilla.com> wrote:
> Type (c) web apps would need to use the check |window.transaction === 
> undefined| to determine whether *transactional* localStorage was 
> supported, and thus aren't affected by either proposal.

Ugh, sorry, I mean type (a) web apps; those that use transactional 


More information about the whatwg mailing list